It’s no longer debatable.
Self-published authors are a force to be reckoned with in the publishing world.
As of June, 2017, more than 45% of all new published works are from non-Big Five, non-publishing house writers. And while a majority of readers’ money is still used to purchase traditionally-published works, indies consume an ever-growing piece of the pie.
This is the world we live in. This is the new face of books, writing, and marketing. Perhaps one day the pendulum will swing in another direction. Or…perhaps not.
*
And yet, behind the scenes of the indie revolution, there’s a battle brewing. The most coveted resource of the modern writer isn’t always money, recognition, or even literary success.
It’s reviews.
Wander the social media accounts of most self-published writers, and you’ll find one thing in common: requests for reviews. New and established authors alike believe the key to getting noticed on sites like Amazon, Goodreads, and Smashwords is having reviews…and plenty of them. This is true for any product, but perhaps doubly so in the minds of the self-published. The perception, if not the reality, is that a pile of four and five-star reviews will earn authors more clicks, and thus more buys.
And while it’s a common theme amongst indies to state, “We’re not in competition with each other – we’re all allies here,” it’s simply not the case. Savvy and successful self-published writers know full well that all resources are limited, that readers aren’t in never-ending supply, and that while good reviews are little chunks of gold, not everyone cares to write them.
Trouble is; while in search of reviews, many authors are in the habit of shooting themselves in the foot.
Here’s just a few of the negative behaviors exhibited:
- Authors spend more time appealing to readers’ willingness to review their books…rather than presenting appetizing stories, blurbs, and cover images
- Authors chastise (either directly or indirectly) readers who either leave no reviews or less than favorable reviews
- In frustration, authors publish full-length articles complaining about negative reviews
- Authors post complaints directly to their social media accounts
- And most grievously, authors forget their audience isn’t other writers, but readers
We all get it. We know marketing is typically the least enjoyable part of the self-publishing process. For a new (or even established) author to leap into the world of selling books is intimidating. Unfair reviewers do exist. Trolls are out there. Readers probably could help out and leave honest reviews more often than they do.
Guess what?
It doesn’t matter.
Authors new and old need to consider:
- In self-publishing, just as in all other parts of life, no one really wants to hear complaints
- The vast majority of people who read aren’t authors, and have no interest in the laundry list of issues self-published writers face
- Time spent complaining online and publishing negative articles would be better spent creating, marketing, and practicing one’s writing craft
- It doesn’t take much negativity to drive potential readers away – they’re here for the story, not a diatribe about the publishing industry
It’s almost understandable. It’s human nature to suffer frustration. The temptation to vent, complain, and commiserate is powerful.
But authors (and in fact, everyone) would do well to resist.
Truth is, a few negative reviews won’t sink a determined writer. Nor will a handful of bad reviews kill sales for a high-quality piece. If an author’s story is truly a work of art, chances are it’ll rise above the others regardless of a smattering of one-star pings. And it’s worth mentioning that authors who earn passionately negative reviews are probably authors who provoke feelings among their readership.
And that’s kind of the point.
Also…
Rather than take to the web in droves to protest negative reviews, authors would serve themselves (and their contemporaries) well to write more, write better, and to brush away the sting of readers’ disdain like so much dirt off their shoulders. The humble, self-aware author absorbs one-star hits privately. They’ll know every reader is different, that trolls and ill-intentioned people do exist, and that their book, while painstakingly created, probably isn’t a groundbreaking masterpiece beloved by every single reader in the world. Those kinds of books are rare. Most of us will write our whole lives and never create such a thing.
And so most of us will suffer bad reviews now and then.
And that’s ok.
So…
What should one do when a beloved story gets one-starred?
- Consider whether the review has any valid points
- If so, address them in your writing, not on Facebook
- If not, shrug and move on with your life
You’ll be happier for it.